Have you had any previous involvement with the document(s) under consideration including authorship, collaboration with the authors, or previous peer review functions? If so, please identify and describe that involvement.
Results
(13 Answers)
user-553126 wrote:
no
user-477751 wrote:
I have been working on halaogenated alkenes and their modes of action and know most people active in the area in person. Have not peer-reviewed this or collaborated on this issue.
user-232578 wrote:
No
user-750802 wrote:
No
user-292467 wrote:
No
user-37600 wrote:
Do you really mean to ask this (boilerplate?) question of this panel, given that the 2 documents we've been given so far provide NO author names? How can I answer this question? (but I'm confident the answer *would* be no...)
user-617591 wrote:
No
user-915125 wrote:
Never had any involvement with the documents under consideration here.
user-432123 wrote:
No
User-850922 wrote:
No
user-125195 wrote:
To my knowledge, no, but since the white paper is being reviewed anonymously I may have had previous involvement with one or more of the authors. To the best of my recollection I have not been involved in the assessment of 1,3-D or epichlorohydrin or any of the papers cited in the document. However, in the early- to mid-1980’s I did work for EPA’s Carcinogen Assessment Group, and I may have helped prepare portions of 1984 epichlorohydrin document cited. I may also have supervised staff working on 1,3-D while in the pesticide program or reviewed material prepared for it, but I have no recollection of doing so.
user-24419 wrote:
No involvement.
user-717898 wrote:
Did not have a look at the documents yet