Moving forward, how important (0=not important; 5=very important) is it that funders publish their research?

Answer Explanations

• View answer

  user-287804

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	1	0	0
  Other	0	0	0	1	0	0

  If the federal government supports the research from public money, it is important that the findings are made public
• View answer

  user-753537

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  crucial! and ideally open to all. 
  doesn't have to be in scientiic journals, can also be online, repositories, websites - but sharing is crucial, ideally with some peer/open review!
• View answer

  user-362477

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Nearly all research should be published at some point (within 3 years).  This gives those involved time to patent any inventions.
• View answer

  user-190025

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  I think and impartial transmission of information is crucial, although realistically, it is virtually impossible for all scientific research to be published. There is off course a economic, political, and social interest in the publishing. 
• View answer

  user-431541

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  For transparency 
• View answer

  user-628049

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  All research, regardless of source of sponsorship, should be conducted independently, published with independent peer review, and free of intervention from the funding source that could lead to bias and inaccuracies in reporting. It doesn't matter if the sponsor is "not going to like these results - or lack of". That is science, and sometimes outcomes are null or even devestating. And all sponsors need to understand the value of those findings and of the independent process.
• View answer

  user-497412

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  There is no point in doing research if it is not published, primarily if funded.
• View answer

  user-124276

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Only publications have the potential to encash your contribute to the globe and at the same time the upcoming research will inspire and get informed about the ongoing projects and ideas.
• View answer

  user-114799

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Federal Government: In the context of research funded by taxpayers, transparency and public dissemination serve critical roles in maintaining accountability and guiding policy-making while advancing scientific progress.
  
  Industry: Despite proprietary concerns organizations have, publishing important research results boosts credibility and cooperation along with trust-building in the fields of health, environmental science and artificial intelligence.
  
  Other: Open publication makes research funded by academic and nonprofit organizations reach wider societal audiences while advancing collective knowledge.
• View answer

  user-962029

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Transparency is essential for all research, regardless of who the scientists are. Publication (and hopefully, peer-review) provides two key processes: the growth of knowledge and, depending on the honesty of the authors, the ability to distinguish truth from lies
• View answer

  user-676080

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	1	0	0
  Other	0	0	0	0	1	0

  • Federal Government: 5 (Critical for transparency, public trust, and open science)
  • Industry: 3 (Balancing proprietary interests with collaborative innovation)
  • Other (e.g., nonprofits, academia): 4 (Important for credibility and knowledge sharing)

  
  
• View answer

  user-481465

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	1	0	0
  Industry	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Other	0	0	0	0	1	0

  NA
• View answer

  user-547538

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Everyone must publish their results, even if they are not likeable
• View answer

  user-518140

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Industry	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  More research that is affiliated with government or industry research is needed for diversity.
• View answer

  user-709065

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  NOT APPLICABLE
• View answer

  user-717296

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	1	0	0
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

   Publishing funded research is essential for transparency, collaboration, and scientific progress—especially for publicly accountable or socially driven funders. Industry faces legitimate IP concerns but still has a role in contributing to shared knowledge where appropriate. 
• View answer

  user-683654

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	1	0	0	0
  Industry	0	0	1	0	0	0
  Other	0	0	1	0	0	0

  Publication is not the real matter but developing the findings into commercializable materials. 
• View answer

  user-816461

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Federal Government (5): As stewards of public funds, federal agencies have a duty to publish the outcomes of supported research. This ensures transparency, public accountability, and wide access to knowledge that can benefit health, policy, and innovation.
  Industry (4): While some proprietary research must remain confidential, greater openness improves credibility, fosters collaboration, and accelerates cross-sector progress. Selective publication (e.g., on safety, efficacy, or environmental data) is vital, especially in sectors like pharmaceuticals or energy.
  Other (5): Foundations, NGOs, and universities often fund research aimed at the public good. Publishing is essential to ensure their missions are fulfilled, impacts are maximized, and findings are accessible to global stakeholders, particularly in low-resource settings.
• View answer

  user-47444

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  I think it's important for research to be consistently published. This is particularly true of federal government funded research which is funded by the tax-payer. There is a significant trend towards federal government funded research to be published in open-access journals. This, however, is not something that I necessarily agree with. Open-access costs have become ridiculous and this, in my view, is a waste of tax-payer money. There are many other ways of publishing research results that do not rely on for-profit publishing companies. Industry should also publish their findings to create trust in their process but they do not have the same obligation to do so as federal government funded research in my view.
• View answer

  user-899866

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  It is highly important to publicize the research that is funded. It is not only to promote your research but to get valuable and constructive feedback from the research community that improves the project/research funded. 
• View answer

  user-807238

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Some funders may avoid publishing data that theoretically will not benefit them. 
• View answer

  user-129134

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Industry	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Other

  While publishing research outcomes is crucial, not every outcome should be made public. Some research should only be published once all related aspects are fully completed. Furthermore, any research deemed entirely confidential must not be published
• View answer

  user-805249

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Regardless of the funding source, publication on peer reviewed Journal  mandatory for finding dissimination.
• View answer

  user-534157

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Likewise, the funder-funded publication make the general public aware that science is indeed happening backstage. The 'must' should be the freedom of publication and a good quality or publications/reports
• View answer

  user-132935

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Publishing funded research is not just important—it’s essential (5/5). Without publication, the value of research is greatly diminished, and opportunities for progress are lost. Open access, preprints, and research repositories are improving this landscape, but funders must remain committed to transparency and accessibility.
• View answer

  user-725082

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Publications are the only way to help reach the common man the outcomes of the research
• View answer

  user-983537

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Published research can be vetted and will benefit the entire society. 
• View answer

  user-629372

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Yes, industry-led research plays a valuable role in advancing innovation, but its credibility depends on transparent publication, independent peer review, and full disclosure of funding and conflicts of interest.

  
  
• View answer

  user-92676

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	1	0	0	0
  Other	0	0	0	1	0	0

  Depends on source of money. Funding from tax payers needs to be transparent.
• View answer

  user-180052

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Unpublshed r research, if not shared  within scientific community and explain its relvance to solving societal benefits   does not make any sense. and uselesss investment of time and financial resources.  
• View answer

  user-97194

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Open, peer reviewed publication is critical for every research.  
• View answer

  user-513377

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Industry	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Other	0	0	0	0	1	0

  It is crucial for both government and private institutions to share their work, particularly when it pertains to public safety. However, there are instances—such as matters involving copyright and national security—where it is necessary to withhold publication of their findings until a designated timeframe has elapsed.
• View answer

  user-606148

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Without publication of all research, even inconclusive and very limited studies, we can't know the whole picture of evidence on a research problem.  The tendency to publish only positive results injects bias into the evidentiary base. 
• View answer

  user-360801

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  When funders publish the research they support, it promotes transparency, accountability, and knowledge sharing. This is especially critical in healthcare and biomedical sciences, where research findings can directly impact public health, clinical guidelines, and future policy.
  
  

  
  

  Publishing results, whether positive, negative, or inconclusive, helps prevent duplication of effort, supports evidence-based decision-making, and ensures that public or private investments contribute to the collective scientific record. It also fosters trust among stakeholders, including patients, researchers, and the broader public.
  
  

  Moreover, in cases where public money is involved, there’s a strong ethical obligation to make the outcomes accessible and beneficial to society.
  
  
• View answer

  user-431578

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Open science is the key to progress, and also to equality among the researches. It is also important to general public, as it is important to be able to verify original publications that are linked to topics under discussion.
• View answer

  user-477986

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Other	0	0	0	0	1	0

   

  Federal Government (5): Very important. Publicly funded research should be openly available for transparency, public benefit, and to advance science and policy.
  
  

  Industry (4): Somewhat important. While companies may need to protect trade secrets or patents, sharing non-sensitive findings can benefit society and improve collaboration.
  
  

  Other (4): Important. Many NGOs and academic institutions are already committed to open science. Publishing research helps build trust and supports further research across sectors. 
  
  
• View answer

  user-580426

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  All research must be published.
• View answer

  user-331846

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  🔹 Federal Government (5/5) 
  
  

  • Since taxpayers fund this research, the public deserves access.
    
    
  • Transparency supports trust in science and evidence-based policymaking.
    
    
  • Open-access government research (e.g., NIH, NSF, NASA) often sparks innovation in both academia and industry.
    
    

  
  🔹 Industry (2–4/5)
   

  • Publishing non-sensitive research can:
    
    
    • Enhance collaboration.
      
      
    • Improve regulatory relationships.
      
      
    • Contribute to scientific progress.
      
      
  • But:
    
    
    • Trade secrets, patents, and competitive advantage often restrict full disclosure.
      
      
    • Importance varies by sector (e.g., pharma publishes more than defense tech).
      
      

  
  🔹 Other (5/5)
   

  • These groups often operate with a mission to serve society, not profit.
    
    
  • Openness fosters trust, promotes global equity in science, and enables replication or improvement by others.
    
    
  • Most academic research already emphasizes peer-reviewed publication and data sharing.
    
    
• View answer

  user-505512

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  This is especially true of negative results. 
• View answer

  user-894724

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Research should be published for public use (except the patents). Advancement in science is right for all. However, the researcher has some rights too that's why patenting should be there.
• View answer

  user-464935

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Industry	0	0	0	1	0	0
  Other	0	0	0	0	1	0

  It is important to publish research- this encourages questioning, peer reviews and scrutiny to ensure that research is happening in a sustainable manner without bias in data.
• View answer

  user-624651

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Industry	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Other	0	0	0	1	0	0

  Publishing research is crucial as it ensures transparency accountability and the broad dissemination of knowledge federal government funded research should always be openly shared to maximize public benefit industry funded research should also be published when possible to advance innovation and foster collaboration while other sectors such as non profits and academic institutions play a key role in making specialized research accessible to the wider community
  
  
• View answer

  user-158538

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  This is simple. If one doesn't publish, the research never happened 
• View answer

  user-368067

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

   Publishing funded research is essential for transparency, accountability, and knowledge sharing. It allows findings to be scrutinized, validated, and built upon by the broader scientific community, accelerating innovation and preventing duplication of effort. Open access to research results—especially when publicly funded—ensures that taxpayers, policymakers, and other stakeholders benefit from the investment. Moreover, publishing promotes collaboration across disciplines and sectors, which is critical for solving complex, global challenges. Without dissemination, even the most groundbreaking research risks being underutilized or forgotten. 
• View answer

  user-483388

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  This is a confusing question - researchers publish, not funders.  I am a strong believer in sharing knowledge especially if it advances social and planetary good.  I believe research, whether it is funded by government, industry, or other sources, should be published.  Patents can be obtained for know-how..
• View answer

  user-13133

  Sector	0	1	2	3	4	5
  Federal Government	0	0	0	0	0	1
  Industry	0	0	0	0	1	0
  Other	0	0	0	0	0	1

  Federal Government – 5 (Very Important):
  Government-funded research is supported through public money, and therefore there is a strong ethical obligation to make results openly available. Openness allows publication to provide openness, replicability, and knowledge-sharing for the common benefit.
  
  Industry – 4 (Important):
  Although intellectual property and competitiveness typically restrict full publication, industry may attempt to publish non-proprietary, safety-critical, or broadly influential research. This supports public trust and collaboration with academia.
  
  Other (e.g., nonprofits, universities, foundations) – 5 (Very Important):
  These disciplines are likely to carry out mission-related research (health, environment, education) and there is a responsibility to share results. Publication ensures responsibility, impact, and informed judgments among society and the science community.